The first time I deleted Twitter was a few years ago on vacation. I spent half a week sitting by a pool, staring at my phone, annoyed at people with the temerity to be wrong on the internet while I was trying to read a book. I deleted the app and spent the rest of the vacation reading happily without an ever-present reminder of everything annoying in the world. A year later I locked myself out of my account entirely, and I’ve never looked back.
Except for work purposes, of course. The urge for an organization to distill their entire ethos into 280 characters of text remains strong. Until recently, at least, the time-and-dating function of posting a tweet was useful for crisis comms. And, although many of us hate to see it, the brands still want to talk to each other somewhere.
But does it need to be on Twitter? As the now-known-as-X cesspool gets larger and engagement shrinks, we’ve gotten that question from many clients, and we’re here with our final thoughts on the matter – as of January 2025, at least.
At Pisano Slater, we’ve been recommending that our clients cease their efforts and investment in Twitter. It’s no longer useful as a tool of mass communication, and it might be actively damaging to an otherwise-neutral reputation. Keep your account handle so no one can spoof or take your name, but no need to keep posting. So then, where to?
Let’s face it: personally, I was never going to get rid of social media entirely, and a few years ago I found a new font of community and irritatingly incorrect people to chat and gossip and complain with as an early BlueSky adapter.
So, that’s my top pick, and the only one of the new text-based replacements that I’ve found to have an almost-comparable level of shitposting, breaking news, expert commentary, and goofing off. It’s not Twitter in its golden years, but neither is Twitter today, and in some ways it might be better.
The good and the bad: it emphasizes links, has no algorithm unless you want to opt into a curated feed, and sends traffic to media sites at a shocking pace. (Outlets from the Boston Globe to The Guardian to EUObserver reported substantially higher engagement and click-through rates on Bluesky than on other sites, with the Globe in particular noting 4.5x higher conversions to paid subs. Anecdotally, many newsletters writers concur.)
Despite the Bluesky userbase’s reputation for being schoolmarmish, it’s not a particularly safe space for many users from marginalized groups, and there are scandalously few politicians to yell at — although this is starting to change. But at least now you can post somewhere without hearing from Matt Yglesias or Jesse Singal.
If none of that appeals, though, here’s what else is out there:
Want to talk social? Drop us a line at info@pisanoslater.com and we’d be happy to advise further!
~Annmarie
Because the last word is rarely the end of the conversation.
Much like penguins, we enjoy bringing you little gifts to show we care:
The climate justice nonprofit Anthropocene Alliance is looking for a fully remote Executive Director, with full benefits and a salary of at least $130k.
Regardless of how badly you messed up the holidays, at least you probably did better than the Charlotte Hornets’ PR genius who gave a 13 year old fan a PS5 during an on-court skit—and then took it back once the cameras stopped rolling.
Ever feel like there’s something fishy about the job search process? It’s not just you: according to a new Harris poll, in 2024 72% of jobseekers said applying felt like "sending a resume into a black box."
Press releases sometimes feel like relics from a simpler, more innocent time. Much like fax machines, most people are aware they continue to exist. What’s less clear: who actually uses these things in 2025? And for what purpose?
If the 2010s were an era of diversity in media, the 2020s are one of consolidation. This presents obvious challenges when trying to get small or medium organizations mentioned in the news. Success depends on riding the waves that already exist, instead of trying to make new ones.
Today, even a glowing review in the New York Times doesn't move the needle that much. Getting people's attention takes a more creative approach. And it all hinges around owning the means of (content) production.
