If you’ve been to a professional conference in the past decade, chances are you’ve heard a lot about “storytelling.”
What’s usually being discussed here is content strategy: using your own social media, newsletter, blog, or other channels to share messages you want audiences to associate with your organization. Sometimes those messages are meant to drive sales or donations, other times they’re meant to convince people you share their values.
The consensus of these talks is that content strategy is important—even crucial—to set yourself apart from all the competitors who are also selling widgets or saving whales. So it’s a little puzzling that most organizations are still so bad at it.
The exceptions prove the rule.
Red Bull is synonymous with adventure thanks to a nonstop flood of extreme sports content (its Red Bull Adventure Instagram account has over 2 million followers). Food52 has had similar success among the “thoughtful eating, joyful living” crowd with its recipes and meal presentation tips (their Instagram has a whopping 3.7 million followers).
For most organizations, though, the fruits of their content strategy are underwhelming at best. This discussion among marketers on reddit shows just how widespread the problem is. Try googling “content marketing dead” for more proof.
If you’ve ever stumbled upon a fitness apparel brand’s blog when searching for a guide to yoga poses, you can probably guess why: most of this “content” just sucks. The most common reasons why:
Having said all that, content strategy can be just as valuable as all those conference panelists claim (and examples like Red Bull and Food52 illustrate). This requires treating content with respect—investing in a talented team to make it, producing it consistently, and ensuring that its primary purpose is to be useful to your audience. And if they happen to buy the plate that your recipe is presented on… well, everyone goes home happy.
None of this is rocket science. But much like long division, it’s trickier than expected when you actually sit down to do it.
(Or, you can just hire someone like us to do it for you.)
Because the last word is rarely the end of the conversation.
Much like penguins, we enjoy bringing you little gifts to show we care:
If you’re a fan of headlines that involve LL Cool J puns and not a fan of digital sharecropping, “Don’t Call It a Substack” will make your day.
Documented—an investigative watchdog and journalism project—is now hiring for multiple Democracy Researcher positions, all fully remote.
The Watermelon Grant offers $2,000 to Palestinian creators in speculative arts, and applications are open now!
Nonprofits shouldn't have to beg for funding to provide vital services. But with federal funding suddenly scarce—and thousands of organizations scrambling to attract attention from the big donors that remain—a new kind of comms strategy is needed.

Slack, Asana, Teams, Monday, Signal, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, email: what do all of these platforms have in common? If you juggle multiple projects, someone is probably sending you messages on all of them. Right at this very moment, perhaps. Here are some tips for managing the onslaught.

[You] may have heard that the math doesn’t seem to be working. As Uber’s COO Andrew Macdonald recently told Business Insider, “[It’s] very hard to draw a line between one of those [AI usage] stats and say, ‘Okay, now we’re actually producing 25% more useful customer features.’” ... [His] message should be a wakeup call for small and medium organizations that have outsourced their strategy and production to Claude & Co.


